Before reading this thread, please read this article from Rocketpunk Manifesto about the workings of 'realistic' megacorps here (read the comments as well): Rocketpunk Manifesto: Corporate Worlds
While in the movie RDA's earth operations are left very vage, apart from the fact that they have influence over the whole of the economy and fit almost all of the evil megacorp cliches. However I feel that RDA's control and authority may be actually less unified than people might think.
Given that RDA started out as a development corperation I suspect it gained its intial capital and power from mining resources (a bit like Vale and BHP Billiton). After this it diversified its interests with different trademarks that are nominally independent if run for the benefit of all (think of the carmakers like volkswagen) an example of this would be the train network it built/owns or operates (its international status would take legal ownership outship the USA where states would be less willing for companies to run train networks without oversight). Eventually its investment arm would have enought capital to buy stakes in other companies such as those that built the ISV venture star, they don't have to be a majority stake, just a large enough stake to make it impossible for the other stakeholder be unable to influence the companies activities without support from RDA. By the 2150's RDA as a company including its sub-companies would be so large that in a way central control would be impossible due to the diseconomies of scale in communication. This means that in effect you have a number of companies , investment, mining, aerospace, commerce operating under the same banner, almost a kind of trade federation described in the above link.
While the rocketpunk manifesto has some points on executive-stockholder relations, there would be many additional merely executive disputes arissing from the situation that I've described above. Instead of a monarchy system where one board or chairman has law, it would be more feudal with the various departments having thier own boards wich have thier own affairs and effectively seperate companies, trying to co-operate with each other, orever scrapping among themselves over funding, investment and recruitment. which are the secret in gaining superiority and therfore growth over the rest. Such company polticies, even worse than today would mean that it would be difficult to impossible for any major changes to be forced through the bureaucracy. This means that even if RDA wanted to stop so distructive, it can't.
Bookmarks