This is a discussion thread about: Who thinks there shouldn't be a sequel? inside the AVATAR 2 Storyline Speculations forum, part of the AVATAR 2 Movie Forums category. Originally Posted by Harrie I think there shouldn't be a sequel. The essence of the movie was Jake torn between ...
I would love a sequel for Avatar. It does have a good track record for sequels, and he has stated that he had more ideas that followed this movie in his original thought process of Avatar. So I am eagerly waiting for the positive for the sequel and hope it doesn't go pear shape.
I don't think the whole story was at the first one..
JC made a long story about na'vi back in 1995 and until now..
The story must be very huge to one movie!
This movie was may part 1,
there is more excited to wait to the second an third movie..
We want more adventure on pandora!!!!!!!!! :D
♥ I Love You Forever, Mike. ♥
Once again, I wholeheartedly agree with you. I have a couple blogs, not on this website, about this issue. The addresses of these blogs are: http://noavatarsequels.blogspot.com and http://newavatarreview.blogspot.com
Please visit these blogs, leave replies, and tell others to do the same (including and especially James Cameron).
Once again I really think that there shouldn't be a sequel.
However, it might actually be okay if instead of years after the first movie, it took place over two or three weeks directly following the end of the first movie, especially if, instead of more movies, it's a small television series (about 10 episodes, focusing on the two or three weeks directly where Avatar left off, and about an hour to an episode, that would be cool).
Bookmarks